Curriculum / ELA / 8th Grade / Unit 9: Twelve Angry Men (2020) / Lesson 5
ELA
Unit 9
8th Grade
Lesson 5 of 11
Jump To
Lesson Notes
There was an error generating your document. Please refresh the page and try again.
Generating your document. This may take a few seconds.
Are you sure you want to delete this note? This action cannot be undone.
Analyze how the playwright propels action in the plot.
Evaluate Juror 8’s persuasion technique based on logic and rational, rather than emotion and gut feeling.
Book: Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose pp. 22 – 29
We participate in the Amazon Associate program. This means that if you use this link to make an Amazon purchase, we receive a small portion of the proceeds, which support our non-profit mission.
Unlock features to optimize your prep time, plan engaging lessons, and monitor student progress.
Tasks that represents the peak thinking of the lesson - mastery will indicate whether or not objective was achieved.
On p. 26, how does Juror 8 move the plot along?
Upgrade to Fishtank Plus to view Sample Response.
Which two pieces of evidence best support the answer above?
On pp. 24 and 25, how is Juror 8’s persuasion technique different than that of Jurors 3 and 10? Make sure to use evidence to support your answer.
Questions about the text that will help guide the students understanding
Suggestions for teachers to help them teach this lesson
This lesson links to one of the unit’s essential questions.
RL.8.3 — Analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character, or provoke a decision.
Next
Analyze how the playwright uses Juror 8 to propel action in the plot.
Build background knowledge on the justice system through an interactive lecture and reading on the American criminal justice system.
Standards
RI.8.2
Review parts of a drama.
Make inferences about character roles and relationships by conducting pre-reading for Twelve Angry Men.
RL.8.3
Make inferences about character motivation and setting through both stage directions and direct lines.
Demonstrate knowledge of the characters by acting/reading aloud Act I.
Analyze the conflicts that emerge between the jurors.
Define “reasonable doubt” and determine whether or not there is evidence of the defendant’s guilt/innocence.
Analyze the playwright’s deliberate choices of character actions and words.
Analyze the irony at the end of Act I.
RL.8.4
Connect the symbolism of the hot weather and the rising tension.
Explain how the stage directions help to create the mood in the jury room.
Analyze the symbolism of each character's actions during Juror 10's monologue.
Explain how the stage directions contribute to Rose's message about justice.
RL.8.2
Debate whether Rose is skeptical or optimisitic about the American Justice System in the 1950s through his teleplay Twelve Angry Men.
Take a position in writing about Rose’s ultimate message about the American criminal justice system.
RL.8.2SL.8.1W.8.1
Create a free account to access thousands of lesson plans.
Already have an account? Sign In
See all of the features of Fishtank in action and begin the conversation about adoption.
Learn more about Fishtank Learning School Adoption.
Yes
No
We've got you covered with rigorous, relevant, and adaptable ELA lesson plans for free